CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for ACCUGEN

USPTO serial 78632455

ACCUGEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JACKSON, STEVEN W
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ACCUGEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William A. Munck

William A. Munck Munck Carter, P.C.Docket Clerk P.O. Drawer 800889Dallas, TX 75380UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Wireless telecommunication devices, namely, digital cellular phones, wireless personal digital assistants, wireless computers and laptop computers that may be upgraded, provisioned, patched and receive software code over-the-air from a wireless networkACTIVE—
038Telecommunication services, namely, the over-the-air transmission and reception of software code to a wireless communication deviceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 29, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 29, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 27, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 27, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 27, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 27, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 4, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 15, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 25, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 24, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 16, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 16, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 15, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 27, 2007RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Apr 27, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Apr 6, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 6, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 6, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 5, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 8, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 30, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 16, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 16, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 18, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 18, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 26, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance