USPTO serial 78632621
MADDEN BY STEVE MADDEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MADDEN BY STEVE MADDEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Long Island City, NY
Long Island City, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Afschineh Latifi, Esq.
AFSCHINEH LATIFI, ESQ. TUCKER & LATIFI, LLP160 E 84TH ST APT 5ENEW YORK, NY 10028-0056UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Bed linen, namely, shams, pillow cases, sheets, duvet covers, blankets and towels | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 10, 2007 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 10, 2007 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 19, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2005 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |