USPTO serial 78632663
CEREUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CEREUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stacey R. Halpern
Stacey R. Halpern KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP2040 MAIN ST FL 14IRVINE, CA 92614-7216UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | PERFUME; COSMETICS, AND PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, EAU DE TOILET, BODY MIST, BODY SPRAY, AFTER SHAVE, AFTER SHAVE BALM, SHAVE CREAM, EXFOLIANTS FOR THE FACE, BODY AND FEET, BODY LOTION, FACE LOTION, FOOT BALM, FOOT LOTION, HAND BALM, HAND LOTION, FACE CREAM, SHAMPOO, CONDITIONER, BATH GEL, BODY WASH, SHOWER GEL, LIP BALM, EYE CREAM, SKIN TONERS, BODY TONERS, FACE TONERS, ASTRINGENTS FOR COSMETIC PURPOSES, CLEANING PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, SOAP, FACE SOAP, BATH SOAP, AND EXFOLIATING SOAP FOR THE SKIN, ALL OF THE FOREGOING GOODS EXCLUDING ANY INDOOR OR OUTDOOR TANNING OR SELF BRONZING PRODUCTS AND ALL OF THE FOREGOING GOODS TO BE SOLD EXCLUSIVELY IN SPECIALTY BOUTIQUES, LUXURY RETAILERS, BETTER DEPARTMENT STORES, SPECIALTY CHAINS, HIGH END RESORTS AND SPAS EXCLUDING TANNING SALONS, BEAUTY PARLORS, HAIR SALONS, UNLESS PART OF A HIGH END SPA/RESORT OR DEPARTMENT STORE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cereus Product Development Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Cereus Product Development Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named CEREUS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 14, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 29, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 29, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 11, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 11, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 4, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 6, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 28, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 30, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 24, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 14, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 22, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 2, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 11, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 26, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 2, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 1, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 15, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |