USPTO serial 78633044
BEST OF UTAH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3219068Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 13, 2007
- Examiner
- LATTUCA, FRANK J
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BEST OF UTAH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter M. de Jonge
Peter M. de Jonge Thorpe North and Western, LLP.8180 South 700 East, Ste 350Sandy, UT 84070UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Section of a newspaper featuring the results of a reader's survey on consumer choices for dining, shopping, entertainment, recreation, events, culture, news, products and services; section of newspaper listing individuals and businesses that have achieved excellence in areas of interest to the general public; section of newspaper featuring restaurants, shopping, entertainment, recreation, events, culture, news, products and services of interest | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Providing information of interest to specific geographical areas via the global computer network, namely, on-line business and restaurant directories and medical referrals | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Providing recognition of individuals and businesses by way of awards to demonstrate excellence or distinction in areas of interest to the general public, including the fields of food and dining services, bar and night club services, retail services, spa and salon services, business services, health and medical services, cultural and educational facilities, music, theater, art, literature, broadcasting and journalism; conducting awards programs honoring individuals and businesses that have demonstrated excellence in their fields, in the quality of their products and services and in customer service | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 043 | Providing information of interest to specific geographical areas via the global computer network in the nature of restaurant reviews | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 044 | Providing information of interest to specific geographical areas via the global computer network in the field of health spa services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Copperfield Publishing, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Copperfield Publishing, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named BEST OF UTAH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 23, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 1, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 2, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 18, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 18, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 14, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 27, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |