Drawing for WIRELESS BINDING

USPTO serial 78633394

WIRELESS BINDING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WINTER, ELIZABETH
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WIRELESS BINDING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard N. Aronson

HOWARD N ARONSON LACKENBACH SIEGEL LLPLACKENBACH SIEGEL BLDGONE CHASE RDSCARSDALE, NY 10583

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007MACHINES FOR BINDING DOCUMENTS, NAMELY, BOOKBINDING MACHINES, DOCUMENT BINDING MACHINESACTIVE—
009PRINTERS; COPIERS, NAMELY, DIGITAL COLOR COPIERS, PHOTO-COPYING MACHINES, ELECTROSTATIC COPYING MACHINESACTIVE—
016PRINTED MATTER, NAMELY, USER'S MANUALS FOR BOOKBINDING MACHINES; PAPER, NAMELY, BOOK-COVER PAPER, ACID-RESISTANT PAPER, BOND PAPER, LASER PRINTER PAPER; BOOKBINDING MATERIAL, NAMELY, BOOK BINDINGS AND CARDBOARD BACKING FOR BINDING BOOKS; ADHESIVES FOR STATIONARYACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 21, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Dec 21, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 20, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 21, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 30, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 19, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 19, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 27, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance