USPTO serial 78633596
QUIKSILVER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPILS, CAROL A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QUIKSILVER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Huntington beach, CA
Huntington beach, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | DRINKS BASED ON YOGHURT; NUTRITIONAL POWDERED MILK FOR FOOD PURPOSES; MILK DRINKS CONTAINING FRUITS; READY TO DRINK MEAL REPLACEMENTS BEVERAGES IN THIS CLASS; MILK BEVERAGES WITH HIGH MILK CONTENT; SOY-BASED FOOD BEVERAGE USED AS A MILK SUBSTITUTE; READY TO DRINK DAIRY BASED PROTEIN FOOD BEVERAGES AND POWDERED WHEY OR SOY BASED PROTEIN FOOD BEVERAGES USED AS MILK SUBSTITUTE; READY TO EAT FOOD BARS WITH A SOY OR WHEY PROTEIN BASE | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | BEVERAGES MADE OF COFFEE; BEVERAGES MADE OF TEA; NUTRITIONAL POWDERED HERBAL FOOD BEVERAGES; CEREAL BASED SNACK FOODS; READY TO EAT CEREAL DERIVED FOOD BARS; GRAIN BASED FOOD BARS; BAKERY GOODS; ENERGY BAR IN THE NATURE OF CANDY BARS; RICE BASED SNACK FOODS, GRANOLA BASED SNACK BARS; WHEAT BASED SNACK FOODS; MUESLI BASED SNACK FOODS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 5, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 19, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 3, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 4, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 23, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 20, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 13, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 9, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 23, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 24, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 26, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |