CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for SEATTLE FISH COMPANY OF NEW MEXICO

USPTO serial 78633946

SEATTLE FISH COMPANY OF NEW MEXICO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3266676Status 780Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 17, 2007
Examiner
RUTLAND, BARBARA A
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with SEATTLE FISH COMPANY OF NEW MEXICO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*

Plus Government fees of $1,300

Trademark Monitoring(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert E. Nail

SF ACQUISITION CORP DBA AKA TA SEATTLE FISH COMPAN18531 S BROADWICK STREETATTN ROGER A O'BRIENRANCHO DOMINGUEZ, CA 90220

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Marketing services, namely, marketing of fish and seafood products for others; wholesale distributorships featuring fish and seafood productsACTIVE—
040Custom manufacture and processing of fish and fish products for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 17, 2026REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Jun 23, 2022ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 19, 2022ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 15, 2021ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 16, 2019ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 10, 2019TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Oct 10, 2019CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 10, 2019CANDCANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999—
Jun 14, 2019PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jun 20, 2018ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 31, 2016NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Oct 31, 2016RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Oct 31, 201689AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Oct 31, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 17, 2016E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2016REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Dec 24, 2012NAS8NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED—
Dec 24, 20128.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Dec 24, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 4, 2012ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2007R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
May 14, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 10, 2007CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
May 10, 2007IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
May 4, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 4, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 4, 2007AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 4, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 9, 2007IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Apr 9, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 2, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 27, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 26, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 26, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 31, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance