USPTO serial 78634185
NICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin B. Schwimmer
Martin B. Schwimmer Moses & Singer LLP405 Lexington AvenueThe Chrysler BuildingNew York, NY 10174Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware; computer hardware and software for digital recording of voice, video, radio, voice over internet protocol, email, instant messaging, Internet, intranet, display screen, wireless and other multimedia communications and data, transmitted via telecommunication equipment and networks; computerized hardware and software for media and meta-data capture, signal processing, signal analysis, security, storage, archiving and dissemination; application software for data management, analysis, interpretation, identification, reporting, and decision support related to recorded and non-recorded voice, video, radio, voice over internet protocol, email, Internet, intranet, display screen, wireless and other unstructured multimedia interactions; application software for call center performance optimization, call center quality monitoring, enterprise business interactions analytics | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business consulting | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications services, namely, the transmission of voice, data and video across the Internet and other global communications networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Product development, customization and production of computer hardware and software; computer systems integration; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting and maintenance of computer hardware and software for digital recording of voice, video, radio, voice over internet protocol, email, instant messaging, Internet, intranet, display screen, wireless and other multimedia communication, transmitted over telecommunication equipment and networks and computerized hardware and software for media and meta-data capture, signal processing, signal analysis, security, storage, archiving and dissemination and application software for data management, analysis, interpretation, identification, reporting, and decision support related to recorded and non-recorded voice, video, radio, voice over internet protocol, email, Internet, intranet, display screen, wireless and other unstructured multimedia interactions | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Security services for the protection of property and individuals; application software for public safety and transportation command and control, scenario reconstruction and investigation, security management, security surveillance and real-time threat detection, alarm analysis and management, lawful interception and intelligence systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2009 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 31, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 24, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 31, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 21, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 15, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |