Drawing for MAKING WAVES

USPTO serial 78634210

MAKING WAVES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VALLILLO, MELISSA C
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAKING WAVES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

M. John Carson

M JOHN CARSON FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI LLP555 S FLOWER ST FL 41LOS ANGELES, CA 90071-2300UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Hair care products, namely, hair gelACTIVEMar 1, 1996

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 24, 2007MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Sep 24, 2007ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 21, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 22, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 22, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 22, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 22, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 22, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 25, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 5, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 25, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 5, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 16, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 16, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 31, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance