USPTO serial 78634914
PUREWRIST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3403050Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 25, 2008
- Examiner
- HOLTZ, ALLISON
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PUREWRIST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Cambridge Endoscopic Devices, Inc.
Framingham, MA
Other trademarks owned by Cambridge Endoscopic Devices, Inc.
Cambridge Endoscopic Devices, Inc.
Framingham, MA
Other trademarks owned by Cambridge Endoscopic Devices, Inc.
Cambridge Endoscopic Devices, Inc.
Framingham, MA
Other trademarks owned by Cambridge Endoscopic Devices, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID M. DRISCOLL
DAVID M DRISCOLL1201 CANTON AVEMILTON, MA 02186UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Surgical and therapeutic devices, namely, jaws, scissors, scalpels, graspers, needle holders, microdissectors, staple appliers, tackers, suction irrigation tools, clip appliers, cutting blades, probes, irrigators, catheters, suction orifices, cameras, detectors, scopes, fluid delivery devices, and syringes for minimally invasive surgery and therapy, in the nature of colonoscopic, upper GI, arthroscopic, sinus, thorasic, transvaginal, orthopedic and cardiac procedures | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 31, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cambridge Endoscopic Devices, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Cambridge Endoscopic Devices, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Cambridge Endoscopic Devices, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named PUREWRIST
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 20, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 19, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 27, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 7, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 14, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 14, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |