USPTO serial 78635048
PERFECT 10
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PERFECT 10?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Beverly Hills, CA
Beverly Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven C. Sereboff
Steven C. Sereboff Pirkey Barber PLLC1801 E 6th St Suite 300Austin, TX 78702UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Gaming tables, chips, and accessories, namely, chip cases, chip carousels, chip trays, table tops and layouts, card shoes, cut cards, betting markers, money paddles, dice sticks, discard holder; poker tables, poker chips, and accessories, namely poker table tops and layouts; dice; craps table, chips, and accessories, namely craps table tops and layouts, craps dice sticks, craps on and off pucks; roulette table, wheel ball, chips, and accessories, namely roulette markers, roulette spinner dish, roulette wheel, roulette gaming felt, table top and layouts; dominoes; baccarat table, chips, and accessories, namely baccarat table tops and layouts; pai gow gaming equipment and accessories, namely, pai gow tiles, pai gow table tops and layouts; lottery wheels, tickets, cards, and game accessories, namely, lottery number balls sets, number drawing equipment, ticket mixing drums, and number wheels; athletic equipment, namely mouth guards, hand wraps, boxing gloves, striking bags, safety and protective pads for boxing, boxing bags, and punching bags; games, namely, board games and parlor games; exercise machines and equipment, namely, jogging machines, rowing machines, stair-stepping machines, stationary cycles, abdominal boards, chest expanders, chest pulls; stuffed dolls and stuffed animal toys; stand alone video game machines; playing cards; backgammon game sets; bingo game playing equipment, bingo cards and bingo markers; amusement game machines; arcade games; pinball machines; bath toys; beach balls; billiard game playing equipment, namely billiard balls, bridges, bumpers, chalk, cue racks, cues, cue tips, cushions, tables, tally balls, and triangles; pool playing equipment, namely balls, bridges, bumpers, chalk, cues, cue tips, cue racks, cushions, tables and triangles; card games; inflatable toys; golfing equipment and accessories namely, golf bags, bag covers, bag pegs, bag tags, golf balls, ball markers, ball retrievers, ball sleeves, golf clubs, club bags, club covers, club grips, club inserts, golf gloves, golf putters and putter covers, golf tees and tee markers; mah jong games and accessories, namely, mah jong tiles, mah jong tables, mah jong chips, and mah jong dice; tennis equipment and accessories, namely, tennis balls, tennis nets, tennis rackets, tennis racket presses, tennis racket covers, tennis racket strings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 27, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 12, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 9, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 5, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 4, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 11, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 26, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 12, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 20, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 31, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 2, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 2, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 16, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |