Drawing for YUVED

USPTO serial 78635099

YUVED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DAHLING, KRISTIN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with YUVED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Wm. Charles Saunders

WM. CHARLES SAUNDERS ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP1800 CONCORD PIKEOW2WILMINGTON, DE 19850

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS AND SUBSTANCES FOR THE PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF DISEASES AND DISORDERS OF THE RESPIRATORY SYSTEM, CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM, PERIPHERAL NERVOUS SYSTEM, CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM, OR GASTRO-INTESTINAL SYSTEM; PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS AND SUBSTANCES FOR USE IN PAIN CONTROL, ANAESTHESIA, ONCOLOGY, TREATMENT OF INFECTION AND INFLAMMATION, UROLOGY, OR GYNAECOLOGYACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 3, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 3, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 12, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 10, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 10, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 27, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 27, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 8, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 8, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 25, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 2, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 12, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 17, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 14, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 23, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 17, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 10, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 10, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 8, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 8, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 30, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 11, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 11, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 31, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance