USPTO serial 78635476
PROTECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3818389Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 13, 2010
- Examiner
- BENJAMIN, SARA NICOLE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PROTECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Castro Valley, CA
Castro Valley, CA
Castro Valley, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher Appleton
EXTREMECARE INC18615 SANDY RDCASTRO VALLEY, CA 94546-2423UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Personal care products, toiletries and fragrances, namely, facial cleansing cream, skin cleansing lotion, skin cleansing gel and cleansing bars, soap for personal use, deodorant soap, body wash, antibacterial skin cleansing soaps, namely, gels and bars, non-medicated pre-moistened cosmetic towelettes impregnated with skin cleansers, skin moisturizers, lotions for face, arms, legs, torso, neck, feet, hands and hair, creams for face, arms, legs, torso, neck, feet, hands and hair, after sun lotion, eye make-up remover, sun protection factor, namely, sunscreen chemical, sold as an integral component of sunscreen creams; anti-wrinkle cream, body skin moisturizer, facial moisturizer, skin whitening lotion, facial moisturizer with sun protection factor, body lotion with sun protection factor; cosmetics, namely, foundation, foundation with sun protection factor, concealer, blush and eye shadow, mascara, eye liner, eyebrow pencil, astringents and skin toner for cosmetic purposes; nail care products, namely, moisturizing nail creams, nail strengthening lotions, and finger nail polish, body scrub, facial scrub, body oil, lip cream, lip balm, lip balm with sun protection factor, lip stick, lip gloss, eye moisturizing cream, hair shampoo, hair conditioner, hair cream, hair gel, hairspray, shaving cream, shaving gel, pre-shaving lotions and creams, after-shave lotions and balm, talcum powder, toothpaste, deodorants and antiperspirants, sun screen preparations, self tanning lotion, cologne, eau de toilette, and perfume | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2015 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 3, 2015 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 13, 2015 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2015 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 27, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 24, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 8, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 13, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 22, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |