Drawing for ALUMAX

USPTO serial 78638091

ALUMAX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PEETE, KYLE C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ALUMAX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert W. Becker

ROBERT W BECKER ROBERT W BECKER & ASSOCIATES707 HWY 66 E STE BTIJERAS, NM 87059UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Buckles for life jacketsACTIVE—
018Animal leashes and leash accessories, namely leash connectors with hooks for connecting more than one animal; animal harnesses, buckles for luggage, handbags, sports bags and backpacks; pet products in the nature of restraining devices, namely, tie-out stakes and tie-out chains for restraining and animal tetheringACTIVE—
022Tie downs and tie down accessories with incorporated anchors, end fittings and strapsACTIVE—
026Belt buckles not of precious metal for clothing; clothing buckles; hair buckles; strap buckles; clothing hooks and fasteners; snap fastener; slide fasteners; zipper fasteners; collar stays, collar buckles, collar hooks, snap, slide and zipper fasteners for pet harnesses and leashes; hooks and eyes, slide fasteners, zipper fasteners, snap fasteners all for luggage, handbags, sports bags and backpacks; hook and eyes for life jackets; hooks and eyes for equine equipment and accessories; hooks and eyes for tethers and tie-outsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 26, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 18, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 17, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 23, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 3, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 11, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 11, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 24, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 22, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 22, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 22, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 16, 2006RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Nov 16, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Oct 25, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 25, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 25, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 14, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 21, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 27, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 27, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 16, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 7, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 7, 2005PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance