USPTO serial 78638315
AUTOSURVEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3304971Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 2, 2007
- Examiner
- KING, CHRISTINA B
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with AUTOSURVEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Markham, Ontario, CA
Markham, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Allen J. Hoover
F. William McLaughlin Wood Phillips500 W. Madison St.Suite 3800Chicago, IL 60661Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for conducting customer satisfaction surveys for businesses in the field of selling goods or services to individual consumers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Business services, namely, conducting customer satisfaction surveys, by telephone or online, for businesses in the field of selling goods or services to individual consumers, and compiling, analyzing and reporting survey results thereof | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 24, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 9, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 6, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2005 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 22, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 19, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |