USPTO serial 78638732
STRENGTH OF DIVERSITY POWER OF FOCUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, MARY
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STRENGTH OF DIVERSITY POWER OF FOCUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Herbie Bohnet, Esq.
HERBIE BOHNET, ESQ. ROPES & GRAY LLP1 INTERNATIONAL PL FL 4BOSTON, MA 02110-2624UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Auction services in the field of securities lending products | ABANDONED | Mar 15, 2003 |
| 036 | Financial services, namely investment management, investment advice and investment of funds for others; insurance underwriting in the fields of life, health and accident; medical insurance underwriting; pre-paid health care underwriting; insurance administration; insurance brokerage; insurance claims administration; insurance claims processing; electronic processing of insurance claims and payment data; insurance consultation; investment brokerage; financial investment in the fields of real estate, securities, funds, timber, derivatives, futures, currencies, commodities; investment consultation; financial services in the nature of an investment security; funds investment and actuarial services; providing securities lending agency and administration services to institutional investors; utilizing the internet to distribute financial information to select counterparties and conduct price discovery; financial analysis; financial consulting; financial management; fiduciary trust and administration services and operations and administrative services related to securities lending products | ABANDONED | Mar 15, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 29, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 29, 2007 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 26, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 12, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 18, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 20, 2006 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 23, 2005 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 23, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 20, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |