CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for CORRELYTICS

USPTO serial 78638814

CORRELYTICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAPPENFIELD, ANN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CORRELYTICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Curtis A. Vock and the law firm of LATHROP & GAGE L.C., with offices in Boulder, Colorado; Clayton, Missouri; Denver, Colorado; Jefferson City, Missouri; Kansas City, Missouri; New York, New York; Overland Park, Kansas; Springfield, Missouri; and St. Loui

Curtis A. Vock LATHROP & GAGE L.C.4845 Pearl East Circle, Suite 300Boulder, CO 80301UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for data acquisition, analytics, correlation and analysis in the fields of electronic transaction management, decision support, decision making, customer support, billing and collections, and instruction manuals, sold as a unitACTIVE—
035Business consulting services and providing business information in the fields of electronic transaction management, decision support, decision making, customer support, billing and collectionsACTIVE—
042Technical consulting services and providing technical information in the fields of electronic transaction management, decision support, decision making, customer support, billing and collectionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 26, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 19, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 12, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2007COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 4, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 4, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 4, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 4, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 4, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 7, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 15, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 26, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 26, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 23, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 8, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 8, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 5, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 5, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 9, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 6, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance