USPTO serial 78639596
HOLYWOOD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUJA, SANDRA
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOLYWOOD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2007 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| May 30, 2007 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| May 30, 2007 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 8, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 8, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 26, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 7, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 6, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 28, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |