USPTO serial 78640139
SMITH MOUNTAIN LAKE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 17, 2006
- Examiner
- KIM, YONG OH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SMITH MOUNTAIN LAKE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Harrisonburg, VA
Harrisonburg, VA
Harrisonburg, VA
Harrisonburg, VA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel L. Fitch
DANIEL L FITCH WHARTON ALDHIZER & WEAVER PLC100 S MASON STHARRISONBURG, VA 22801-4022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Paper goods, namely, bumper stickers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 6, 2006 |
| 021 | Porcelain and earthenware, namely, glasses, cups, mugs, plates [ and bowls ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 6, 2006 |
| 025 | Clothing and headgear, namely, short and long sleeved shirts and sweaters, shorts, pants, [ socks ] and hats | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 6, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Christophel, Paul R.
- Other trademarks owned by Christophel, Paul R.
- Other trademarks owned by Christophel, Rebecca A.
- Other trademarks owned by Christophel, Rebecca A.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named SMITH MOUNTAIN LAKE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2017 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 17, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Nov 14, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 15, 2012 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 7, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 24, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 24, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |