Drawing for THE PLEASURE POINT PUMPER

USPTO serial 78640158

THE PLEASURE POINT PUMPER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STINE, DAVID
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE PLEASURE POINT PUMPER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael A. Guth

2-2905 East Cliff DriveSanta Cruz, CA 95062UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028SkateboardsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 1, 2008PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jan 15, 2008PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Dec 31, 2007PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Dec 31, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 27, 2007PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Nov 15, 2007PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Nov 15, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2007PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Oct 2, 2007APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Sep 17, 2007PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 12, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 12, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 24, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 24, 2007PGEXPETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED—
Mar 6, 2007PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 3, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 2, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 2, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 7, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 18, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 28, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 23, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 21, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 21, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 7, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance