Drawing for MDD

USPTO serial 78640164

MDD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SLOAN, CYNTHIA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MDD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark Tidwell

Mark Tidwell Haynes and Boone, LLP2323 Victory Avenue, Suite 700IP SectionDallas, TX 75219

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Hydrocarbon drilling servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 30, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 30, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 26, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 19, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 12, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2007UNDCUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED—
Aug 15, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 11, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 8, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 18, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 17, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 9, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 14, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 25, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 5, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 23, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 23, 2005CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 22, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 22, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 21, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 7, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance