Drawing for BALLPARK VILLAGE

USPTO serial 78640274

BALLPARK VILLAGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUTTON, JENNIFER JO
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BALLPARK VILLAGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jill Reynolds Seidman

Jill Reynolds Seidman Cordish & Cordish601 E. Pratt St., 5th FloorBaltimore, MD 21202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025clothing, namely T-shirts, shirts, sweat shirts, pants, sweat pants, jackets, caps, visors, hats, headbands, socks, shoes, beltsACTIVE—
035providing retail services, namely gift shopsACTIVE—
036Shopping center services namely, rental of shopping center space; real estate management in the field of shopping centers and retail shopping outlets; leasing of a building or portions thereofACTIVE—
041Entertainment, namely live performances by musical bands and singers; entertainment services, namely, night clubs; providing mixed-use entertainment facilities; karaoke clubs; comedy clubs; puppet or animation theaters; operating motion picture theaters, live performance theaters, dinner theaters, amusement arcades, providing virtual reality entertainment facilities, family recreation facilities, museumsACTIVE—
043Restaurants; sports barsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 22, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 22, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 7, 2009EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jul 7, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 11, 2009EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 11, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 4, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 4, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 29, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 29, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 2, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 2, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 2, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 6, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 29, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 29, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 29, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 28, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 28, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 28, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 26, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 26, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 31, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 11, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 21, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 11, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 22, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 3, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 23, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 23, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 28, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 7, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance