USPTO serial 78640366
MINNESOTA WATERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 25, 2007
- Examiner
- DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with MINNESOTA WATERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MINNESOTA LAKES ASSOCIATION, INC.
BRAINERD, MN
MINNESOTA LAKES ASSOCIATION, INC.
BRAINERD, MN
MINNEAPOLIS, MN
Sauk Rapids, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Pickerill
John Pickerill FREDRIKSON & BYRON PA200 S 6TH STSTE 4000MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1425Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational services, namely, providing classes, seminars, and workshops in the field of water quality and distribution of related water quality course material in connection therewith | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MINNESOTA LAKES ASSOCIATION, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MINNESOTA LAKES ASSOCIATION, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CONSERVATION MINNESOTA
- Other trademarks owned by Rivers Council of Minnesota
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named MINNESOTA WATERS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2019 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2019 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 15, 2019 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 7, 2019 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2018 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Jul 6, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 25, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 25, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2014 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2014 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jan 27, 2014 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 27, 2013 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Dec 26, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 24, 2013 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 25, 2007 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 21, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 20, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |