USPTO serial 78640570
PRINCIPAL SEARCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3150185Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 26, 2006
- Examiner
- GAAFAR, SAMIR MICHAEL
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PRINCIPAL SEARCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel M. Gurfinkel
JOHN L. AMBROGI WELSH & KATZ LTD120 S RIVERSIDE PLZ FL 22CHICAGO, IL 60606-3912UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | [ BUSINESS MANAGEMENT SERVICES; PROVIDING BUSINESS OFFICE FUNCTIONS; PROFESSIONAL BUSINESS CONSULTANCY; ] EMPLOYEE LEASING; EMPLOYMENT AGENCIES; JOB AND PERSONNEL PLACEMENT; PERSONNEL PLACEMENT AND RECRUITMENT; [ ASSISTANCE IN THE MANAGEMENT OF BUSINESS ACTIVITIES, NAMELY, DIRECT PROFESSIONAL ASSISTANCE IN THE DEVELOPMENT AND HANDLING OF TRANSACTIONS AND MANAGEMENT OF COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 7, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2017 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 8, 2007 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| May 8, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 26, 2006 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 16, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 28, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |