USPTO serial 78640588
SOUNDCHECK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRAY, CAROLYN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SOUNDCHECK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Paradise Valley, AZ
Paradise Valley, AZ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
C. Robert von Hellens
C. ROBERT VON HELLENS CAHILL, VON HELLENS & GLAZER P.L.C.155 PARK ONE2141 E. HIGHLAND AVENUEPHOENIX, AZ 85016Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | on-line retail store services featuring downloadable pre-recorded music and video | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 24, 2007 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 5, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 23, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 23, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |