USPTO serial 78641905
GLOSS.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANOSKI, JOANNA MARIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GLOSS.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lesley A. Moradian
LESLEY A MORADIAN THE ESTEE LAUDER COMPANIES INC767 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10153UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Perfumery, namely after shave balms, After shave lotions and after shave gels; cologne, eau de parfum, eau de toilette, essential oils for personal use and perfume; Toiletries, namely, fragranced body lotions, body creams, body powders, body sprays; Toiletries namely, bath crystals, bath oils, bath powders, bath salts, body moisturizing cream, skin cleansers, facial cleansers, body creams, skin exfoliants for use on the body exfoliating, body lotions, shower gels, bath gel, facial wash, body powders, body scrubs, body toners, body oils, hair anti-frizzing preparations, hair conditioners, hair elixirs, hair gloss, hair mascara, hair mousses, hair nourishers, hair shampoos, hair sprays, hair straightening preparations, hair styling creams, hair styling gels, hair styling wax, sunscreens preparations for the hair, hair thickening preparations, hair tonics, hand creams, personal soaps, salt scrubs for the skin; shimmering beauty gels, lotions and creams for body; Cosmetics; Non-medicated skin care preparations, namely anti-perspirant/deodorants, anti-wrinkle creams, lotions and gels, skin cleansing lotions, skin cleansing creams, skin cleansing gels, pre-moistened cosmetic cleansing wipes, eye creams, eye gels, eye makeup removers, face creams, beauty gels for the face, face lotions, face masks, facial emulsions, facial exfoliating preparations, facial makeup removers, facial moisturizers, facial mousse, non-medicated skin care preparation, namely tonic and lotion for controlling facial skin oil, facial soaps, facial toners, personal soaps, salt scrubs for the skin, shaving foams, creams, lotions and gels, skin balancing lotion, non-medicated skin care preparations for preventing blemishes, skin bronzing creams, lotions and gels, cosmetic preparations for brightening the skin, skin conditioners, skin firming preparations, namely cream, lotion and gel; skin lighteners, non-medicated stimulating lotions for the skin, skin moisture renewal creams, lotions and gels; skin repair creams, lotions and gels, sunblock preparations, sunless tanning preparations, sunscreens preparations for the body and face and after-sun soothing and moisturizing preparations, tinted moisturizers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 20, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 25, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 24, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 24, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |