USPTO serial 78642648
SUPERBIO AG BLEND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 6, 2007
- Examiner
- ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with SUPERBIO AG BLEND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pilot Point, TX, US
Pilot Point, TX, US
Pilot Point, TX, US
PILOT POINT, TX, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George R. Schultz
George R. Schultz Schultz & Associates, P.C.5400 LBJ FreewaySuite 1200DALLAS, TX 75240-1067Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Cultures of bacteria and micro-organisms for agricultural industry use not for medical and veterinary use | ACTIVE | Feb 18, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AG-Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by AG-Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by AG-Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by TENFOLD TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Similar marks named SUPERBIO AG BLEND
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2018 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 16, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 16, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 7, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 19, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 5, 2013 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 4, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 18, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 19, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 26, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 6, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 15, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |