Drawing for GOTTA GO!

USPTO serial 78642901

GOTTA GO!

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HESIK, APRIL ANNE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GOTTA GO!?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Heather McDonald

Heather McDonald PFIZER INC.TRADEMARK DEPARTMENT 5TH FLOOR MS26150 EAST 42ND STREETNEW YORK, NY 10017

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Printed materials, namely, manuals, booklets, pamphlets, newsletters, leaflets, charts, catalogs and posters all on the topic of overactive bladder; paper display boxes on the topic of overactive bladderACTIVE
044Medical information services, namely, providing information relating to overactive bladder and the diagnosis and treatment of overactive bladder; on-line information services, namely, providing medical information relating to overactive bladder via a global computer networkACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 26, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 26, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 1, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 24, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jun 24, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jun 24, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 17, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Dec 17, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Dec 17, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 24, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
May 29, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
May 29, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 26, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 3, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 13, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 16, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 15, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 28, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Jul 28, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 28, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jul 28, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jul 11, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 27, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 27, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 26, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 9, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance