USPTO serial 78643145
SEMES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SEMES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Cheonan-si, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David R. Haarz
HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE PLC11730 PLZ AMERICA DR STE 600RESTON, VA 20190-4759UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | machines for manufacturing semiconductors, machines for cleaning semiconductors, machines for etching semiconductor wafers, machines for drying semiconductor wafers, machines for developing semiconductor wafers, machines for coating semiconductor wafers, machines for manufacturing flat panel displays, machines for cleaning flat panel displays, machines for etching flat panel displays, machines for developing flat panel displays, machines for coating flat panel displays, machines for drying flat panel displays, machines for manufacturing super twisted nematic liquid displays, machines for manufacturing organic light emitting diodes; material flow systems consisting primarily of conveyors for the transportation of flat panel displays during the manufacturing process; machines for manufacturing flat panel display modules | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 24, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 26, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |