Drawing for SHOREPHONE

USPTO serial 78643644

SHOREPHONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SALEMI, DOMINICK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SHOREPHONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Connie L. Ellerbach, Esq.

CONNIE L ELLERBACH FENWICK & W LLPSILICON VALLEY CTR801 CALIFORNIA STMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware and computer software and manuals sold as a unit, for the management, administration, and control by others of telecommunications systems, private branch exchange systems or call distribution systems; telecommunication and communications switches, routers and servers; computer software for installing telecommunications systems and for training others in the use and operation of telecommunications systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 26, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 23, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 28, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 28, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 30, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 7, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 15, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 9, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 9, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 30, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 24, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 24, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 10, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance