USPTO serial 78644273
BLITZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BLITZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Wiltshire, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew N. Spivak
ANDREW N SPIVAK MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP1650 TYSONS BOULEVARDS, STE 300MCLEAN, VA 22102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electrical apparatus for kitchen and laundry use, namely, clothes washing machines and dishwashers; apparatus for cleaning, polishing and shampooing floors and carpets, namely, vacuum cleaners, carpet shampooers, floor polishers; dry cleaning apparatus for floors and carpets, namely, vacuum cleaners, carpet shampooers and floor polishers, all featuring a mechanism for dispensing cleaning agents to floors and carpets; floor tool cleaner heads for vacuum cleaners, carpet shampooers and floor polishers; electric motors for domestic appliances; switched-reluctance electric motors for domestic appliances; separators for removing dust and debris from the airflow in vacuum cleaners; hoses and filters for vacuum cleaners; parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2006 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |