Drawing for FREEDOM BLADE

USPTO serial 78644810

FREEDOM BLADE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KING, LINDA M
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with FREEDOM BLADE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Battery-Operated Electric Razors featuring Vibrating BladesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 4, 2006MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 4, 2006ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 4, 2006OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jul 3, 2006OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 3, 2006OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 6, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 17, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 19, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 7, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 3, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 3, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 20, 2006PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jan 4, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 30, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 27, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 27, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 10, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance