USPTO serial 78644833
SOLIO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLANDU, FLORENTINA
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SOLIO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark C. Hornor
MARK C HORNOR1508 6TH STBERKELEY, CA 94710UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SOLAR POWERED BATTERY; SOLAR POWERED BATTERY CHARGERS; SOLAR POWERED AUXILIARY POWER SUPPLIES FOR ELECTRONIC DEVICES; Apparatus for converting electronic radiation to electrical energy, namely photovoltaic solar modules; dry cells; photovoltaic cells; solar batteries; capacitors; chargers for electric batteries; storage battery chargers; all for use with portable electronic devices, namely mobile phones, portable music players, digital cameras, mobile phone accessories, battery chargers, solar power devices, computers, digital cameras, personal device acessories (hand held computers); mobile phone accessories, battery chargers, solar energy chargers for use with portable electronic devices, computer hardware, compact discs, films, video recordings, mobile phones, digital cameras, electronic personal organisers, computer software | ACTIVE | May 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 5, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 30, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |