USPTO serial 78645266
CUSTOM CUTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CUSTOM CUTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roberto Ledesma
ROBERTO LEDESMA COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN PC1133 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-6799UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY; WEBCASTING SERVICES; TRANSMITTING LIVE, REAL-TIME AND PRERECORDED AUDIO AND/OR VIDEO VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK, MOBILE TELEPHONE OR OTHER ELECTRONIC OR DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK OR DEVICE; ELECTRONIC AND DIGITAL TRANSMISSION AND DELIVERY OF VOICE, DATA, TEXT, IMAGES, GRAPHICS, SIGNALS AND MESSAGES VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK, MOBILE TELEPHONE OR OTHER ELECTRONIC OR DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK; INSTANT MESSAGING SERVICES; PROVIDING ON-LINE CHAT ROOMS AND ELECTRONIC BULLETIN BOARDS FOR TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES AMONG USERS IN THE FIELD OF SPORTS, ENTERTAINMENT AND RELATED TOPICS; PROVIDING MULTIPLE-USER ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK FOR THE TRANSFER AND DISSEMINATION OF A WIDE RANGE OF INFORMATION | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 23, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 27, 2008 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 15, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 31, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 12, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 23, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 29, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |