USPTO serial 78645392
SUPER PLAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3774849Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 13, 2010
- Examiner
- CLARKE, NANCY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SUPER PLAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LUBBECKE, DE
LÜBBECKE, DE
32312 Lübbecke, DE
SPIELO INTERNATIONAL GERMANY GMBH
LUBBECKE, DE
32312 Lübbecke, DE
32312 Lübbecke, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Denise Taliaferro
10 Memorial Blvd., Suite 100c/o IGT Global Solutions CorporationProvidence, RI 02903-1152Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electric and electronic apparatus, instruments, devices and machines, namely, coin operated machines and machines operable with bills, magnetic cards, computer chips, micro-processor devices and tokens, namely, gaming and gambling machines; [ mechanical units in the nature of hoppers for dispensing coins, as replacement parts of coin-operated and coin-controlled electronic gaming and gambling machines; gaming machines operable with coins, money bills and tokens; apparatuses for billing operations of coin-operated machines, namely, computer software used to generate bills in connection with coin operated gaming and gambling machines; automated data storage machines in the nature of computers, computer printers that display total winnings on the faces of gaming machines; electronic printed circuit boards; coin changer machines, vending machines which provide tokens, coupons and game cards; ] electric and electronic machines and apparatuses for games, amusement, entertainment and gaming, namely, slot machines, gaming equipment, namely, gaming machines, video slot machines, casino gambling machines [; video game consoles for use with an external display screen or monitor; slot machines and structural parts therefor, betting machines for betting on sports and other events; computer game cassettes and cartridges for electronic pocket games; prerecorded magnetic data carriers programmed for electronic video and audio display for playing electronic games ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by IGT GERMANY GAMING GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by GTECH GERMANY GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by Atronic International GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by SPIELO INTERNATIONAL GERMANY GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by Atronic International GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Atronic International GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named SUPER PLAY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 2, 2016 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| May 2, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 23, 2016 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 25, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 11, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 26, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 24, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 21, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 20, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 3, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 2, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 28, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 31, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 22, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 28, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 28, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 23, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 24, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |