USPTO serial 78645751
KIMCHIKHAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KHOURI, SANI PHILIPPE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KIMCHIKHAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Chang S. Shin, ESQ.
CHANG S SHIN ESQ LAW OFFICE OF CHANG S SHIN369 PINE ST STE 428SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104-3310UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | SERVICES FOR PROVIDING FOOD AND DRINK, NAMELY, RESTAURANT AND BAR SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 23, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 3, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 23, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 24, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 1, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 11, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 28, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 5, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |