USPTO serial 78645763
PLAIN JANE NATURALS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEEL, ALYSSA PALADINO
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PLAIN JANE NATURALS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | ASTRINGENTS FOR COSMETIC PURPOSES, BABY OIL, BABY POWDER, BATH GEL, BATH OIL, BATH POWDER, BEAUTY MASKS, NON-MEDICATED BATH SALTS, BODY CREAM, BODY OIL, BODY POWDER, BODY SPRAYS, BODY LOTIONS, BODY MOISTURIZERS, BODY MISTS, BUBBLE BATH, SKIN CLEANSING LOTION, COLD CREAM, HAIR CONDITIONERS, COSMETIC PENCILS, EYE CREAMS, EYE GELS, HAND CREAM, NIGHT CREAM, SHAVING CREAM, SKIN CLEANSING CREAM, SKIN CREAM, VANISHING CREAMS, ESSENTIAL OILS FOR PERSONAL USE, EYE MAKEUP, EYE MAKEUP REMOVER, EYE PENCILS, EYE SHADOW, EYEBROW PENCILS, EYELINERS, FACE POWDER, FACIAL SCRUBS, FOUNDATION MAKEUP, HAIR GEL, SHAVING GEL, SHOWER GEL, SKIN MOISTURIZER, NAIL LACQUER AND GLITTER, NAIL POLISH, NAIL POLISH TOP COAT, TALCUM POWDER, ROUGE, SKIN CLARIFIERS, SKIN CLEANSING LOTIONS, SKIN LOTION, BODY SOAPS, SKIN SOAP, GLYCERIN SOAP, SKIN TONERS, DEODORANT SOAP, LIQUID SOAPS FOR HANDS, FACE AND BODY, SUN TANNING PREPARATIONS, WRINKLE REMOVING SKIN CARE PREPARATIONS, LIP PENCILS, LIP BALM, BLUSHERS; SUN CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, GELS, LOTIONS, SUN TAN OIL IN SPRAY FORM, AFTER SUN LOTIONS AND SUN TAN GELS; FOOT CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, FOOT LOTIONS, NON-MEDICATED FOOT POWDER; ORAL CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, TOOTHPASTE, TOOTH GEL, TOOTH POWDER, MOUTH WASH; AROMA THERAPY PRODUCTS, NAMELY, ESSENTIAL OILS; HAIR CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, SHAMPOO AND CONDITIONER, HAIR CLEANING PREPARATIONS, HAIR GELS, HAIR REMOVING CREAM, HAIR RINSES, HAIR LIGHTENERS, HAIR DYE, HAIR SPRAY, HAIR STYLING PREPARATIONS; NON-MEDICATED HAIR CARE PREPARATIONS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2007 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 23, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 6, 2006 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 14, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 14, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 23, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 14, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 5, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |