Drawing for ACTIVE OBJECTS

USPTO serial 78646177

ACTIVE OBJECTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, DEBRA ANN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ACTIVE OBJECTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Craig M. Stainbrook

BERNARD MALINA MALINA & ASSOCIATES PC60 E 42ND ST RM 501NEW YORK, NY 10165-0502UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for enabling the user to insert, store and extract metadata and media files into and from image filesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 7, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 6, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 6, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 2, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 1, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 2, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 2, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 19, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 18, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 26, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 3, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 3, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 13, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance