Drawing for ICHEER

USPTO serial 78647588

ICHEER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLYBURN, CARLA DIONNE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ICHEER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alfred H. Chan

ALFRED H CHAN SHEN & CHAN, APLC805 W DUARTE RD STE 106ARCADIA, CA 91007-7539UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009electronic equipment and apparatus, namely, computer, computer scanners, computer speakers, computer peripherals; computer software, namely, for use in optical scanning, image taking and video recording; PC video cameras, digital cameras, digital camcorders, digital voice recorders, MP3 players, accessories for cameras and consumer electronic scanning, namely, batteries, charger, docking station; DVD players, DVD players combined with memory card readers, DVD reader and writer, DVD players combined with CD reader and writer, DVD players combined with DVD recorders, CD reader and writer; memory cards, memory card readers; liquid crystal projectors; equipment and accessories for home theater, namely, television sets, amplifier, audio-visual receiver, TV and video converters, electric wires and cable, cable connectors, remote control devices for liquid crystal projectors, televisions, amplifier, audio system, DVD player; audio system comprising speakers, amplifier, receiver; audio speakerACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 26, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 5, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 12, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 23, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 25, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 21, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 14, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 11, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 30, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 30, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 20, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 4, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 4, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 29, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 14, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance