USPTO serial 78647677
AMIGO KIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRECKENFELD, WILLIAM G
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AMIGO KIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN, FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-5621UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Telecommunications products, namely, telephones, cellular telephones and telephone answering machines; apparatus for recording, transmission, reproduction of sound or images, namely, phonograph records, CD and DVD players, audio and video taperecorders; blank audio and video tapes and CDs; stereo receivers, amplifiers, and tuners; blank magnetic data carriers, data processors and computers; computer hardware, namely, memory cards, modems, computer interface boards, blank magnetic computer tapes, fax machines, fiber optic cables, computer and electric cables, optical character recognition apparatus, blank optical discs, optical scanners, magnetic coded cards for prepaid telecommunications services; satellites, blank digital optical disks,computer keyboards, process computers, computers for data and word processing,computer terminals, computer printers, computer monitors, integrated circuits and components, namely, computer chips; electronic circuit boards, electronic notice boards, integrated circuit cards; downloadable ring tones and master tones, namely, ac lip of a song in its original format; downloadable text files featuring news in the field of entertainment; downloadable wallpaper graphics, images and photographs, all of the foregoing downloadable via the Internet and wireless devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Administradora de Marcas RD, S. de R.L. de C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Administradora de Marcas RD, S. de R.L. de C.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named AMIGO KIT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 10, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 14, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2012 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2012 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 9, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 5, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 2, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 2, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 11, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 20, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 11, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 27, 2010 | TPAD | TEAS PETITION TO AMEND BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 19, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 29, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 9, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 13, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 9, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 8, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |