Drawing for JULIO CESAR CHAVEZ

USPTO serial 78648470

JULIO CESAR CHAVEZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JULIO CESAR CHAVEZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas P. Philbrick

Thomas P. Philbrick ALLMARK TRADEMARK4041 SUGAR MAPLE DR STE ADANVILLE, CA 94506-4640UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, headwear, headbands, wristbands, t-shirts, shirts, tops, sweat shirts, belts, championship belts, footwear, socks, robes, jackets, jogging pants, pants, track suits, boxing trunks, tank tops, polo shirts, sports bras, shorts, warm up suits, jerseys, turtlenecks, vests, windshirts, infant and toddler one piece clothingACTIVE—
028Sporting goods, namely, jump ropes, boxing gloves, sparring gloves, medicine balls, heavy bag gloves, protective bras, hand wraps, athletic tape, knuckle guards, punching mitts, body protectors, body shields, rib guards, boxing head gear, mouth guards for athletic use, athletic cups and supporters, abdominal protectors, weight lifting gloves, weight lifting beltsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 21, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 21, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 29, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 19, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 19, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 19, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 19, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 19, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 19, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 19, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 26, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 6, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 1, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 28, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 24, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 11, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 5, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 5, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 4, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 16, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance