USPTO serial 78648986
NEXT BASE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3697132Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 13, 2009
- Examiner
- WIENER, MICHAEL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NEXT BASE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Apollo Electronics Group Limited
Kowloon Bay, Kowloon, HK
ROAD TOWN, TORTOLA,, VG
ROAD TOWN, TORTOLA, VG
ROAD TOWN, TORTOLA, VG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARY BETH CIOCCO
MARY BETH CIOCCO MARY BETH CIOCCO, L.L.C.22255 CENTER RIDGE ROAD, SUITE 106ROCKY RIVER, OH 44116UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | GAMES AND PLAYTHINGS, NAMELY, ACTION SKILL GAMES, ACTION FIGURES, ARCADE GAMES, BATTERY POWERED COMPUTER GAMES WITH LCD SCREEN WHICH FEATURES ANIMATION AND SOUND EFFECTS; AMUSEMENT GAME MACHINES; APPARATUS FOR ELECTRONIC GAMES OTHER THAN THOSE ADAPTED FOR USE WITH TELEVISION RECEIVERS ONLY, NAMELY, FLOOR-STANDING UNITS FOR PLAYING ELECTRONIC GAMES OTHER THAN IN CONJUNCTION WITH A TELEVISION OR COMPUTER, ARCADE TYPE ELECTRONIC EDUCATION VIDEO GAMES; AUTOMATIC GAMES OTHER THAN THOSE ADAPTED FOR USE WITH TELEVISION RECEIVERS, NAMELY, TABLETOP UNITS FOR PLAYING ELECTRONIC GAMES OTHER THAN IN CONJUNCTION WITH A TELEVISION OR COMPUTER, HAND-HELD UNIT FOR PLAYING ELECTRONIC GAMES, STAND-ALONE VIDEO GAME MACHINES; AUTOMATIC AND COIN OPERATED ELECTRONIC AMUSEMENT APPARATUS, NAMELY, AMUSEMENT GAME MACHINES, ELECTRONIC DART GAMES; AUTOMATIC ELECTRONIC GAMES NOT ADAPTED FOR USE WITH TELEVISION RECEIVERS, NAMELY, ARCADE-TYPE ELECTRONIC VIDEO GAMES; COIN AND COUNTER OPERATED ELECTRONIC ARCADE GAMES; ELECTRONIC ACTIVITY TOYS, NAMELY, CHILDREN'S MULTIPLE ACTIVITY TOYS; ELECTRONIC AMUSEMENT APPARATUS ADAPTED FOR USE WITH LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAYS, NAMELY, AMUSEMENT GAME MACHINES, ARCADE-TYPE ELECTRONIC VIDEO GAMES, ELECTRONIC EDUCATIONAL GAME MACHINES FOR CHILDREN; ELECTRONIC PLAYTHINGS, NAMELY, HAND HELD UNIT FOR PLAYING ELECTRONIC GAMES; ELECTRONIC REMOTE CONTROLLED TOYS, namely, CARS, RACE CARS, AIRPLANES, BOATS; ELECTRONIC TOYS, NAMELY, BUILDING BLOCKS, ACTION FIGURES; ELECTRONIC CHESS GAMES NOT ADAPTED FOR USE WITH TELEVISION RECEIVERS, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC BOARD GAME, ARCADE GAME; RADIO CONTROLLED TOY VEHICLES; SCALE MODEL VEHICLES, NAMELY, TOY MODEL VEHICLES; TOY PISTOLS; TOY VEHICLES; TOYS, NAMELY, ACTION FIGURES, STUFFED TOYS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Apollo Electronics Group Limited
- Other trademarks owned by GEAR SYSTEM INC.
- Other trademarks owned by GEAR SYSTEM INC.
- Other trademarks owned by GEAR SYSTEM INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named NEXT BASE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 5, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 12, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 18, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 18, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 16, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 12, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 20, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 30, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 20, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 28, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 28, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 8, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 5, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 22, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 17, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |