USPTO serial 78649348
FILM GRAIN TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3342337Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 20, 2007
- Examiner
- PARK, JENNY K
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FILM GRAIN TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ISSY-LES-MOULINEAUX, FR
Boulogne-Billancourt, FR
Boulogne-Billancourt, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michelle L. Visser
Michelle L. Visser Rader, Fishman & Grauer PLLC39533 Woodward Ave., Ste. 140Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Apparatus and equipment for reading, recording, transmitting, reproducing sound and images, namely, digital satellite transmitters and receivers, digital cable transmitters and receivers, digital versatile disc and optical disc players and recorders, high definition digital versatile disc and optical disc players and recorders, video receivers, encoders, decoders, video cameras, cinematographic cameras, digital cameras, video recorders, video disc players, personal video recorders, video-audio adapters, video processing software; broadcast equipment, namely, video servers, production switchers, and routers; post production equipment, namely, scanners and telecines; software for the rendering of movie pictures in high definition quality; management software for processing and editing video films and other video media | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | Television program and cinema broadcasting services, namely, broadcast of cable television programs for others, satellite television broadcasting for others, subscription television broadcasting for others, television program broadcasting via cable for others, broadcasting services and provision of telecommunications access to films and television programs provided via a video-on-demand service, and streaming of video material on the Internet for others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 039 | Storage of film and other video media; electronic storage of video images and audio | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Film and video media processing services, namely, color enhancement of black and white cinematic film, closed captioning of films and videos, digital correction services of videos, and video transfer, namely, providing color correction and conversion of motion picture film to video film; film and any other video media reproduction, namely, remastering of films from one format to another, and duplication of cinematic films and video cassettes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Film production and post-production services; distribution of television programs, cinematic films, and videos for others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TECHNICOLOR
- Other trademarks owned by Thomson
- Other trademarks owned by Thomson
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named FILM GRAIN TECHNOLOGY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 18, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 18, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 11, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 17, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 12, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 12, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 16, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |