USPTO serial 78649736
BRADLEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3386349Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 19, 2008
- Examiner
- SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BRADLEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LOS ANGELES, CA
Culver City, CA
The Bradley Collection Limited
Ipswich, GB
The Bradley Collection Limited
Ipswich, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kristen M. Walsh
Kristen M. Walsh NIXON PEABODY LLP1300 CLINTON SQUAREROCHESTER, NY 14604UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Curtain pole systems of metallic and non-metallic materials comprised of poles and curtain hooks and related parts and fittings therefor; curtain rail systems of metallic and non-metallic materials and related parts and fittings therefor, namely, curtain rails, curtain poles, curtain rods, curtain tracks, curtain rings, curtain hooks, finials, eyelets for curtain hooks, draw rods, hold backs for curtains, passing rings and brackets, * none of the foregoing for use with showers * | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 9, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BRADLEY COLLECTION, INC., THE
- Other trademarks owned by BRADLEY COLLECTION, INC., THE
- Other trademarks owned by The Bradley Collection Limited
- Other trademarks owned by The Bradley Collection Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named BRADLEY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2018 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 19, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 5, 2014 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2013 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| May 6, 2013 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 6, 2013 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 30, 2013 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 30, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 12, 2012 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 27, 2012 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 14, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 5, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 18, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 23, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 3, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 24, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 17, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |