USPTO serial 78649948
PINNACLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 12, 2006
- Examiner
- MARTIN, EUGENIA K
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PINNACLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Cequent Electrical Products, Inc.
Tekonsha, MI
Cequent Electrical Products, Inc.
Tekonsha, MI
Cequent Electrical Products, Inc.
Tekonsha, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James M. Durlacher; C. David Emhardt; Joseph A. Naughton; John V. Moriarty; John C. McNett; Thomas Q. Henry; Charles R. Reeves; Vincent O. Wagner; Steve Zlatos; Sprio Bereveskos; R. Randall Frisk; Daniel J. Lueders; Kenneth A. Gandy; Timothy N. Thomas; Ku
James M. Durlacher; C. David Emhardt; Joseph A. Na Woodard, Emhardt, Moriarty, McNett & Henry LLP111 Monument CircleSuite 3700Indianapolis, IN 46204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electronic brake controls for use with land vehicles | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 28, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cequent Electrical Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Cequent Electrical Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Cequent Electrical Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named PINNACLE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 19, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 13, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 26, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 26, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 6, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 11, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |