USPTO serial 78650152
E-PERA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3435953Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 27, 2008
- Examiner
- LEE, DEBRA ANN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with E-PERA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES E. SHLESINGER
JAMES E. SHLESINGER SHLESINGER, ARKWRIGHT & GARVEY LLP1420 KING STREETSUITE 600ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-2750Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | MAGNETICALLY ENCODED DEBIT CARDS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 036 | FINANCIAL SERVICES, NAMELY, MONEY TRANSFER SERVICES,ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFER SERVICES, BILL PAYMENT SERVICES,AUTOMATIC TELLER MACHINE SERVICES, DEBIT AND STORED VALUE CARD SERVICES, AND DIRECT DEPOSIT SERVICES; FUNDS TRANSFER SERVICES,NAMELY, THE TRANSFER OF FUNDS FROM AND TO FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, FROM AND TO CREDIT CARD ACCOUNTS AND FROM AND TO MEMBERS; ELECTRONIC CASH TRANSACTIONS, NAMELY, AUTOMATIC TELLER MACHINE CASH WITHDRAWALS AVAILABLE AT AUTOMATED TELLER MACHINES,PERSON TO PERSON AND PERSON TO BUSINESS MONEY TRANSFER SERVICES OFFERED VIA THE INTERNET AND ELECTRONIC MAIL; AUTOMATED FINANCIAL CLEARING HOUSES, DEBIT CARD SERVICES AND ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFERS; ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC PROCESSING AND TRANSMISSION OF BILL PAYMENT DATA | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | DELIVERY OF MESSAGES BY ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION AND ELECTRONIC MESSAGE TRANSMISSION SERVICES, VIA FACSIMILE, MAIL,TELEX, TELEGRAPH, TELEGRAM, TELEVISION CABLE, TELEPHONE, GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK, VIDEO STREAM AND SATELLITE TECHNOLOGIES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PAYSTONE TECHNOLOGIES CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by PAYSTONE TECHNOLOGIES CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by PAYSTONE TECHNOLOGIES CORP.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named E-PERA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 27, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 21, 2008 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 18, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 28, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 12, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 11, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 21, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 28, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 1, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |