Drawing for GET SEERIOUS

USPTO serial 78650649

GET SEERIOUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SLOAN, CYNTHIA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GET SEERIOUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael A. Malinzak/Geoffrey D. Aurini

MICHAEL A MALINZAK/ GEOFFREY D AURINI HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE PLCPO BOX 828BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48303-0828UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Heating, air conditioning and refrigeration systems, namely, refrigeration condensing units, furnaces, air conditioning units, evaporator coils, furnace boilers, heat exchangers, heaters, conversion burners, heat pumps and component parts thereforACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 29, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Apr 29, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 29, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 28, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 5, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 16, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 3, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 3, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 12, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 12, 2007DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED
Mar 7, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jan 11, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jan 11, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Nov 22, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Jul 14, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 14, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 11, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 6, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 6, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 6, 2006GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 6, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 3, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 20, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance