USPTO serial 78651057
VALENTINO RUDY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YAO, GRETTA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VALENTINO RUDY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anne Hiaring
ANNE HIARING HOCKING HIARING + SMITH LLP101 LUCAS VALLEY RDSTE 300SAN RAFAEL, CA 94903Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Watches | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2012 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 1, 2012 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 1, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 18, 2012 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 27, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 5, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |