USPTO serial 78651591
INSTANT HEDGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3161094Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 17, 2006
- Examiner
- LAMOTHE, LESLEY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INSTANT HEDGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Chula Vista, CA
Chula Vista, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Douglass Jennings, Jr.
J DOUGLASS JENNINGS JR J DOUGLASS JENNINGS, JR APC9171 TOWNE CTR DR STE 350SAN DIEGO, CA 92122-6214UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | RETAIL STORE FEATURING MATURE, LIVE HEDGE PLANTS GROWN IN BOXES OF VARYING LENGTHS WHICH ARE DESIGNED TO BE RELOCATED EASILY AND WHICH WILL SUSTAIN THE PLANTS WITHOUT THE NEED FOR RE-PLANTING IN THE GROUND | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 2006 |
| 044 | RENTAL OF MATURE, LIVE HEDGE PLANTS GROWN IN BOXES OF VARYING LENGTHS WHICH ARE DESIGNED TO BE RELOCATED EASILY AND WHICH WILL SUSTAIN THE PLANTS WITHOUT THE NEED FOR RE-PLANTING IN THE GROUND | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 8, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 5, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 29, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 5, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |