USPTO serial 78652962
WAVEPASS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3349582Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 4, 2007
- Examiner
- FATHY, DOMINIC
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WAVEPASS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Spiddal, Co. Galway, IE
Tourmakeady County, Mayo, IE
Tourmakeady County, Mayo, IE
TOURMAKEADY, COUNTY MAYO, IE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard M. Cohn
Howard M. Cohn Howard M. Cohn & Associates30195 Chagrin Blvd.Suite 300CLEVELAND, OH 44124Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic radio frequency identification transponders, smart cards, fobs and USB/FireWire tokens, having contactless interfaces containing an integrated circuit and software program used to store and retrieve electronic value, namely, electronic cash, tickets, loyalty points, encrypted data and biometric templates; software for the operation of radio frequency identification transponder devices in identification applications namely, access control, biometric information checking, verification of personal credentials and privileges and copyright protection; software for the operation of radio frequency identification devices in ticketing and payment applications, namely, electronic transactions, namely, micro-payment, e-couponing, e-loyalty programs, vending, electronic purse, exchange and e-commerce as well as ticketing in transportation, event ticketing and seating assignment; software for the operation of radio frequency identification devices in network security applications, namely, network login, encryption and decryption process, authentication and verification for the purpose of secure identification; software for the operation of the radio frequency identification devices to communicate with interface network computer hardware between electronic radio frequency identification device readers and writers and data transmission lines or computers; user manuals for all the aforesaid goods sold therewith as a unit; and structural parts for the aforesaid goods | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 15, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DPD Patent Trust
- Other trademarks owned by DPD Patent Trust
- Other trademarks owned by DPD Patent Trust
- Other trademarks owned by FEINICS AMATECH TEORANTA
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named WAVEPASS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2018 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 4, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 14, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 13, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 3, 2013 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 26, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 1, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 10, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 18, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 15, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 23, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 3, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 16, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 17, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |